{"id":1314717,"date":"2026-03-02T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-03-02T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wisconsinwatch.org\/?p=1314717"},"modified":"2026-02-27T15:32:16","modified_gmt":"2026-02-27T21:32:16","slug":"wisconsin-beaver-management-plan-dnr-natural-resources-trout-fish-flood-climate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wisconsinwatch.org\/2026\/03\/wisconsin-beaver-management-plan-dnr-natural-resources-trout-fish-flood-climate\/","title":{"rendered":"Pest or climate ally? DNR weighs new beaver management plan under mounting scrutiny","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"Reading Time: <\/b><\/span> 6<\/span> minutes<\/span><\/span>\n

Members of an ad hoc Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources committee are urging wildlife regulators to work with a national expert as they finalize recommendations<\/a> to guide state beaver management policy for the next decade.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Researchers and conservationists serving on the advisory body \u2014 which is largely composed of DNR staff and government and tribal representatives \u2014 hope that including additional scientific expertise, and even a potential computer-guided aerial beaver dam mapping survey<\/a>, could assist regulators at a time when climate change is beginning to significantly alter Wisconsin weather patterns and pose widespread ecological risks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe’re taking our species out faster than they can recover, and when we are overexploiting our trout, when we’re overexploiting animals, plants, habitats, that’s going to make us lose these species faster,\u201d said University of Minnesota ecohydrology professor Emily Fairfax, who has helped review and fact-check several beaver management plans and recently spoke to the committee. \u201cI don’t think we have time to wait \u2014 full stop.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A shift would transform long-standing beaver policy that frames the critters as a nuisance species.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Agriculture\u2019s wildlife services program has removed beavers and their dams in Wisconsin since 1988 under contract with the state, along with local governments, railroad companies and Indigenous tribes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At least five states across the Mississippi River basin and Great Lakes region contract with the federal wildlife services program for beaver removal, but Wisconsin stands out among states for the quantity of beavers and dams USDA employees clear, the millions of dollars Wisconsin has invested to do so and the state\u2019s justification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Current trout policy includes killing beavers <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

USDA killed roughly 23,500 beavers across 42 states in 2024, about 2,700 of which were in Wisconsin, ranking the state among the top five in the nation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Wisconsin, the agency focuses on abating transportation hazards, such as flooded roadways. But, perhaps most controversially, about a third of sites where USDA traps beavers are coldwater streams.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wisconsin currently prioritizes maintaining free-flowing conditions on the state\u2019s prized coldwater streams, partly to appeal to its \u201ccustomers\u201d and their fishing preferences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A
Henry Nehls-Lowe, Southern Wisconsin Trout Unlimited board secretary, casts his fly-fishing line in Sixmile Branch, a Class 2 trout stream, Oct. 7, 2024, in Grant County, Wis. Federal trappers killed about 2,700 beavers in Wisconsin in 2024. About a third of those were in coldwater streams. Wisconsin prioritizes free-flowing conditions to benefit anglers. (Joe Timmerman \/ Wisconsin Watch) <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

But the strategy has faced increasing scrutiny, even among anglers, who are divided over the issue. Some beaver advocates say the state agency charged with protecting and enhancing natural resources shouldn\u2019t let commercial interests unduly guide its decisions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 2025, the agency trapped and cleared dams in more than 1,550 miles of coldwater streams \u2014 roughly the driving distance from Milwaukee to Salt Lake City, Utah. The DNR uses proceeds from annual trout fishing stamp sales to finance the annual undertaking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At least two other states, Minnesota and Michigan, have employed the USDA for trout stream clearing, but at a significantly reduced scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\t\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\tRelated Stories<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/h2>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Opting\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/figure>\n\t\t\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

Opting for coexistence: Some Wisconsin landowners learn to live with beavers<\/a><\/h3>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/article>\n\n\t\t\n\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"An\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/figure>\n\t\t\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

An ecosystem engineer\u2019s vision: mock beaver dams to restore Wisconsin wetlands<\/a><\/h3>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/article>\n\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Dam\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/figure>\n\t\t\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

Dam lucky: How we caught a beaver (on camera)<\/a><\/h2>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/article>\n\n\t\t\n\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Has\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/figure>\n\t\t\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

Has climate change contributed to flooding in Wisconsin?<\/a><\/h2>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/article>\n\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n\n

The DNR doesn\u2019t know the impacts of these policies on Wisconsin\u2019s beaver population, as it ceased conducting aerial surveys in 2014. Agency staff, instead, estimate beaver numbers and harvest impacts using trapper surveys and voluntary reporting of annual take. Staff believe the population remains stable statewide or is even growing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conservationists are calling on the DNR to systematically survey the state\u2019s beaver population. Without obtaining a reliable count, they say, it\u2019s impossible to devise a science-based management plan. Even if beaver removal continued on trout streams, critics say the state could better estimate the population by having trappers register their beaver take, as the DNR requires for turkey, deer, bobcat and bear harvests. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, an expanding body of research is showcasing beavers\u2019 ecosystem and economic benefits and the drawbacks of removal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beaver dams help limit flooding<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

When beavers remain on the landscape, they create wetlands, which mitigate climate change impacts like drought, wildfires and flooding. Problems <\/em>thought to be endemic to the American West are now creeping eastward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thunderstorms wreaked havoc in southeastern Wisconsin<\/a> last summer, bringing more than 14 inches of rain to some parts of Milwaukee within 24 hours on Aug. 9-10. Roughly 2,000 homes sustained major damage or were destroyed in the ensuing floods, and the county now faces more than $22 million in public infrastructure<\/a> repairs after being twice denied federal disaster assistance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beaver dams can dissipate torrents of water when the sky opens \u2014 even to the city\u2019s benefit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Using computer models, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee researchers estimated that the Milwaukee River watershed could accommodate enough beaver colonies to reduce flood water volumes by 14% to 48%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wisconsin beaver policy understudied<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

But scientists face decades of institutional consensus in Wisconsin that beavers degrade stream habitat and threaten wild coldwater fisheries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DNR fish biologists say that beavers warm water temperatures and plug coldwater streams with silt. When unobstructed, the water bodies, which tend to contain few fish species, flow fast and hard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cPast studies have identified some positive but mostly negative effects of beavers on trout, and my research builds upon this,\u201d DNR fisheries scientist Matthew Mitro told the beaver management committee. \u201cThe option for lethal removal (of) beavers is an important tool that should remain available for resource managers.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet critics charge DNR biologists with managing streams for the primary benefit of one species by trapping out another, justifying the practice using research that hasn\u2019t undergone scientific peer review.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"A
Henry Nehls-Lowe, Southern Wisconsin Trout Unlimited board secretary, nets a brown trout he caught while fly-fishing in Big Spring Branch, a Class 1 trout stream, Oct. 7, 2024, in Grant County, Wis. (Joe Timmerman \/ Wisconsin Watch)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

A 2011 academic review of beaver-related research conducted in the Great Lakes region, which predated Mitro\u2019s recent research<\/a>, found that 72% of claims concerning beavers\u2019 negative impacts are speculative and not backed by data, while the same held true for 49% of positive claims. The negative claims included the idea that beaver dams warm stream temperatures and block trout passage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DNR biologists often note that academic literature largely has been conducted in the western United States and can\u2019t be directly transplanted to Wisconsin\u2019s comparatively flat landscape.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is all the more reason to get off our haunches and wade into beaver ponds, Fairfax said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe have to follow that up by collecting our own data sets,\u201d she said. \u201cWe have to publish them in peer-reviewed journals and get that scientific stamp of approval.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beaver trapping and natural predation are distinct from targeted eradication, Fairfax noted. The former can be sustainable, while stream-wide depopulation and dam removal can damage entire ecosystems. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s also possible that stream clearing prevents beavers from moving to parts of Wisconsin where they are wanted or where they could thrive with fewer conflicts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Federal government assesses Wisconsin\u2019s beaver dealings <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The DNR beaver management plan\u2019s update coincides with a new USDA environmental assessment of the potential impacts of its beaver and dam removal in Wisconsin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A conservation organization founded by beaver management committee member Bob Boucher announced its intent to sue the federal agency to compel it to update its previous assessment, published more than a decade ago. Then Boucher threatened to sue the DNR after it wouldn\u2019t release a draft of the new one<\/a>, currently under review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 2013 assessment determined that USDA\u2019s involvement in clearing streams and conflict areas did not significantly impact the beaver population. It estimated wildlife managers would only trap about 2,000 beavers annually, but the agency exceeded that figure within a few years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The USDA recommends staying the course, using lethal and nonlethal methods. When analyzing alternatives, the agency concluded that other wildlife managers would continue trapping with or without federal involvement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The USDA allocates some funding for the installation of flow control devices<\/a> that can reduce the footprint of beaver ponds by lowering water levels. But nearly all beaver conflict sites the USDA handles in Wisconsin are managed through trapping. Levelers do have limited effectiveness in settings like high-flow streams or infrastructure-heavy floodplains. <\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"A
A tree impacted by beaver activity, Oct. 25, 2024, in Alma Center, Wis. (Joe Timmerman \/ Wisconsin Watch) <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Wildlife managers say that they need flexibility because no two beaver sites are identical. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe\u2019re not against beaver complexes,\u201d DNR fisheries biologist Bradd Sims told committee members. \u201cWe\u2019re not against ecosystem diversity, and I don\u2019t know why people try to paint us that way. We\u2019re an open-minded bureau that\u2019s open to different management styles.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trout and beaver proponents do agree that climate change poses an existential threat to biodiversity. While the former group might view beavers as harmful to coldwater streams, the latter see their potential as a partner in creating resilient landscapes that accommodate not only fish, but also frogs, turtles, bugs, bats, birds and humans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The committee\u2019s next meeting is March 18 in Rothschild, Wisconsin. Ultimately, DNR staff will rewrite the current plan, release a draft for public comment and discussion at open houses, and present a revised document to the state\u2019s natural resources board for ratification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This story was produced in partnership with the <\/em>Mississippi River Basin Ag & Water Desk<\/em><\/a>, an editorially independent reporting network, of which Wisconsin Watch is a member. Sign up for Wisconsin Watch\u2019s <\/em>newsletters<\/em><\/a> to get our news straight to your inbox.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As federal trappers remove thousands of beavers each year \u2014 including from prized trout streams \u2014 Wisconsin regulators face calls to weigh the critter\u2019s flood-control benefits against long-standing views of them as a nuisance.<\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"author":738,"featured_media":1314720,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"single-feature.php","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"gigafact_has_fact_brief":false,"gigafact_remote_fact_brief_post_id":0,"gigafact_remote_sync_timestamp":"","gigafact_remote_sync_status":"","gigafact_remote_sync_response":"","gigafact_has_been_published":false,"newspack_ads_suppress_ads":false,"newspack_popups_has_disabled_popups":false,"newspack_sponsor_sponsorship_scope":"","newspack_sponsor_native_byline_display":"inherit","newspack_sponsor_native_category_display":"inherit","newspack_sponsor_underwriter_style":"inherit","newspack_sponsor_underwriter_placement":"inherit","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"apple_news_api_created_at":"2026-03-02T14:11:04Z","apple_news_api_id":"7a10bb6e-a9e6-4cc3-9d85-1782b6494a62","apple_news_api_modified_at":"2026-03-02T14:11:04Z","apple_news_api_revision":"AAAAAAAAAAD\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/w==","apple_news_api_share_url":"https:\/\/apple.news\/AehC7bqnmTMOdhReCtklKYg","apple_news_cover_media_provider":"image","apple_news_coverimage":0,"apple_news_coverimage_caption":"","apple_news_cover_video_id":0,"apple_news_cover_video_url":"","apple_news_cover_embedwebvideo_url":"","apple_news_is_hidden":"","apple_news_is_paid":"","apple_news_is_preview":"","apple_news_is_sponsored":"","apple_news_maturity_rating":"","apple_news_metadata":"\"\"","apple_news_pullquote":"","apple_news_pullquote_position":"","apple_news_slug":"","apple_news_sections":[],"apple_news_suppress_video_url":false,"apple_news_use_image_component":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_newspack_byline_active":false,"_newspack_byline":"","newspack_content_restriction_is_exempt":false,"newspack_featured_image_position":"large","newspack_post_subtitle":"As federal trappers remove thousands of beavers each year \u2014 including from prized trout streams \u2014 Wisconsin regulators face calls to weigh the critter\u2019s flood-control benefits against long-standing views of them as a nuisance.","newspack_article_summary_title":"Overview:","newspack_article_summary":"","newspack_hide_updated_date":false,"newspack_show_updated_date":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false},"categories":[19351,25],"tags":[6118,3656,18918,980,3617],"partner":[],"newspack_spnsrs_tax":[],"type-of-work":[],"coauthors":[5980],"class_list":["post-1314717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ag-and-water","category-environment","tag-mississippi-river-basin-ag-water-desk","tag-news","tag-wanted-beavers","tag-wisconsin-department-of-natural-resources","tag-wisconsin-watch","entry"],"fact_brief":null,"apple_news_notices":[],"parsely":{"version":"1.1.0","canonical_url":"https:\/\/wisconsinwatch.org\/2026\/03\/wisconsin-beaver-management-plan-dnr-natural-resources-trout-fish-flood-climate\/","smart_links":{"inbound":0,"outbound":0},"traffic_boost_suggestions_count":0,"meta":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Pest or climate ally? DNR weighs new beaver management plan under mounting scrutiny","url":"http:\/\/wisconsinwatch.org\/2026\/03\/wisconsin-beaver-management-plan-dnr-natural-resources-trout-fish-flood-climate\/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/wisconsinwatch.org\/2026\/03\/wisconsin-beaver-management-plan-dnr-natural-resources-trout-fish-flood-climate\/"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wisconsinwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/asse6561092-scaled.jpg?fit=140%2C93&quality=100&ssl=1","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wisconsinwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/asse6561092-scaled.jpg?fit=2560%2C1707&quality=100&ssl=1"},"articleSection":"Ag & Water","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Bennet Goldstein \/ Wisconsin Watch"}],"creator":["Bennet Goldstein \/ Wisconsin Watch"],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Wisconsin Watch","logo":"https:\/\/wisconsinwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/ww-logo-footer-1.png"},"keywords":["mississippi river basin ag & water desk","news","wanted: beavers","wisconsin department of natural resources","wisconsin watch"],"dateCreated":"2026-03-02T12:00:00Z","datePublished":"2026-03-02T12:00:00Z","dateModified":"2026-03-02T12:00:00Z"},"rendered":"